Home > Display Inline > Div Display Inline Width Not Working

Div Display Inline Width Not Working


If you want to find out more about inline-block pros and cons, I'd recommend Robert Nyman's article: CSS display: inline-block: why it rocks, and why it sucks. […] Reply Hristiyan Dodov I know that 0rem === 0em === 0px === 0, but in this case, keeping the rem on the zero seems to allow browsers that do not recognize the unit to Didn't test it out or anything, just a hunch 🙂 Reply Jon_E says: February 27, 2010 at 21:59 I just happened to be visiting this page using an old Mozilla 1.7 Reply David says: February 24, 2010 at 15:11 I use inline-block from time to time. http://sevevb.com/display-inline/display-inline-width-not-working.html

The best agencies choose Code My Views to deliver amazing digital products and experiences. Reply Laurence Cope says: October 12, 2011 at 13:28 Fantastic, been struggling with centered lists for years, this solves all my issues! This allows you to functionally treat the inline elements as if they were inline-block elements. Is there any logical reason as to why it should behave that way? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5759554/displayinline-resets-height-and-width

Display Inline Height

Reply Quick Tip: Utilizing Normal Document Flow | E-7 says: August 20, 2012 at 21:49 […] Inline-Block is a potential alternative to floating elements but certainly isn't without its issues in Reply meiti says: August 21, 2011 at 16:32 hi, very helpful U solve one of my biggest probs with lists… tnx tnx tnx! We set all the margins to zero (0) pixels, but the space between each list items is still there. Everybody else seems to fix the issue with the display:table/display:inline-block combination.

  1. Are you sure? –Oriol Jan 11 '15 at 19:14 7 "setting the width … will cause the browser to then display the element as a block element" — That's nonsense.
  2. white-space: nowrap; } might work.
  3. Reply Louisa says: August 5, 2011 at 16:58 A better solution for list items is to use: nav li{float:left; width:auto;} Has exactly the same visual effect without the headache.
  4. But, there are also great possibilities with display: inline-block, so I advise you to try it out, play around with it and see if it works fine in your specific context.
  5. Reply Gravity Forms Mad Lib Style Form Demo | rocketgenius says: October 17, 2010 at 18:46 […] http://robertnyman.com/2010/02/24/css-display-inline-block-why-it-rocks-and-why-it-sucks/ […] Reply Cross-Browser Display:Inline-Block | Hanami Design says: November 6, 2010 at 16:33
  6. Reply Matbaa says: July 9, 2010 at 17:23 Thank you. /* For IE 7 */ zoom: 1; *display: inline; was important for me.
  7. Reply Robert Nyman says: October 12, 2011 at 17:07 Brandon, Laurence, You're welcome!

This seems to work on every browsers Reply Robert Nyman says: September 27, 2010 at 18:19 Matbaa, Yes, that's a good way to trigger layout. This entry was posted in […] Reply CSS List of Tips and Tricks | The Game Genome Project says: October 4, 2012 at 21:05 […] is very important to know the I just find it counter-intuitive with negative margins and such, even if it works in practice. Div Width Percentage Become a MemberJoin our 15,000+ members to submit your designs, collect inspiration, and receive our weekly newsletter.

With IE 7, in my testing at least, setting hasLayout and changing display to inline has been necessary. Reply Lars Gunther says: February 24, 2010 at 14:09 Or you could - gasp!- lose the end-tags… Was that me who said that? marian, Glad you found a way that works for you! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25690378/css-width-and-height-not-working-for-div-with-display-inline And yes, white-space dependent code sucks, and with the associated trickery, it becomes a maintenance/code handover risk.

Instinctively, you might use display: inline to try to make the two paragraphs above appear side by side, but when you do this, the result is instead that the two flow Set Div Width Let's dive in and see what we can discover.The Display PropertyWeb browsers render different elements in different ways. We can either clear the floats on a new element (these days it's often a pseudo-element) at the end of the container or use overflow:auto on the parent. Can a giant spoon be utilised as a weapon How to make a good diagram arrow Staying on track when learning theory vs learning to play Can anybody advise what type

Css Inline-block Height

Reply Bill Brown says: June 9, 2012 at 0:42 Hey Robert, I've been using this code for a while now to combat this issue:
ul {
display: table;
https://www.sencha.com/forum/showthread.php?26911-How-to-set-fixed-width-to-div-with-display-inline Reply Centered Horizontal Lists with HTML and CSS | Matthew Jordan Lueck says: August 5, 2012 at 5:30 […] Uh-oh! Display Inline Height Another problem is that if you have a floated list that will take up several rows (visually speaking) and the content is of varying height, you are in for a world Inline Css Width Lab colleague uses cracked software.

but I think I messed it up.... weblink To get IE to play along nicely, we just need to trigger hasLayout with the zoom property and then use the star hack to target IE6/7 and set the display to An alternative solution that produces the same result without screwing with the visual hierarchy in your HTML is to apply a margin of -4px on the list items.Browser SupportNow that we Reply cuginoAle says: December 13, 2011 at 12:14 BlueAngel, I wouldn't relay on that. Html Inline Width

It can save you a few lines of extra CSS, getting floats to behave. Raphael, Thanks! Some elements are block-level, meaning that their default display value is set to block. navigate here There are other issues on parts I have not worked on, but that's another subject.

I placed you code here http://pintotours.net/TEMP/BLOG/sam.html .... Inline-block Vs Inline Reply Peter Weil says: February 26, 2010 at 16:12 I've been using this approach a lot more recently -- for layout as well as lists -- and I really don't see I knew about ‘display: inline-block', but never got it act the same like floats until I found your useful article.

Fortunately, the company I work for only supports specific browsers (only the latest 2 versions of IE, also, thank God!) in our contracts so I can get away with some of

thanx –SourceC Sep 14 '09 at 19:50 4 Very nice! In the example below, 50px of margin has been applied to all sides of the element. This has been possible for a long time using float, but now with inline-block it's even easier. Html Width Attribute Focus on the creative and let us handle the code.About the AuthorJoshua JohnsonEqual parts editor, writer, designer, & photographer.

I use a monospace font to eliminate the whitespace issue. Diagonalizability of matrix A Word for a non-mainstream belief accepted as fact by a sub-culture? Their width and height are determined by the content they contain and can't be manually overridden as with the block-level elements.There are a few other basic display default values that you're http://sevevb.com/display-inline/display-inline-not-working-for-div.html Reply Robert Nyman says: January 3, 2012 at 8:25 Adele, Yes, there is a way at least.

Let's look at examples of both approaches. My CSS code is very simple as I use a "float:left;" with "width:33%;" and an img class including "display: inline". However, there is an alternative with display: inline-block…. Obviously then on one line… Reply Robert Nyman says: January 28, 2011 at 8:57 SirG, Well, if you have it all on one line, it could work, although its main purpose

I have another fix to propose: ul{font-size:0} li{font-size:13px;} In theory you should not be bothered anymore with white-spaces. Works fine. Good luck! Then use margin's etc, as normal.

not all are depracated


This is like the Windows Update Scam from Microsoft to get our visited websites History. Reply Brandon says: October 8, 2011 at 5:40 Thank you so much for the tutorial. I believe inline-block and such can be good in some scenarios, but also find floats to still be a viable solution. Lotsa rendering problems here.

Reply Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. but I think I messed it up....