Home > Not Working > Disable-output-escaping Not Working In Firefox

Disable-output-escaping Not Working In Firefox


  • Disable-output-escaping= Yes Not Working
  • Disable-output-escaping Yes Is Not Working In Xslt
  • My webapges consists of three parts: - opening of layout (title bar, left panel, few opened s) - content (area for most information) - closing of layout (right panel, footer, few

    The ability to insert the formatted HTML into xml in a form of CDATA is not much different than adding innerHTML to DOM element. If firefox doesn't support that feature, why can't you put a tiny little message on the console saying that it won't work because of it? Burke, is public domain, and can be found at http://www.fadshop.net/xsl_mop-up.js. Shortly XSLT spec. Check This Out

    I can't do it in mozilla because if you insist that result of xsl transformation must be tree then result of each match must be complete node, and all of Burke that does the work, and Scott Mitchell has written a very complete tutorial on how to make it work in the case of RSS (which is probably 95% of the I don't have day without crash, and now it comes this. But in last project i have a task to do a ajax load of pages, and i have to rewrite a many xsl's to javascript implementation, instead of just using browser https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98168

    Disable-output-escaping= Yes Not Working

    disable-output-escaping is not supported in Firefox CDATA concatenation or: disable-output-escaping is not supported in Firefox ... Nonetheless, it's great that the Firefox developers are looking at this now. I'm left with the pityful alternative of using Javascript to warn the customers to use Internet Exploder. For such a migration it'd be great if I could use html fragments already written wich often are not properly formed xml by just putting them in CDATA sections with quouting

    1. However this bug is not the forum for XSLT education so I won't go into details here.
    2. This ensures that the output is well-formed XML.
    3. I currently do this using disable-output-escaping="yes" and it works everywhere except NS6 Comment 9 Jonas Sicking (:sicking) No longer reading bugmail consistently 2001-10-14 13:34:10 PDT just use instead of  
    4. From this point of view you modify not only how the output is serialized but you really modify the output tree.
    5. That wouldn't require reparsing the entire document, but I think it would allow web developers to do most of what they want d-o-e for (e.g.
    6. If you don't care, that's fine too. –LarsH Apr 7 '15 at 18:25 @LarsH Stack Overflow is a community wiki so we don't "own" the questions, I think after
    7. Imagine if Firefox did not support innerHTML because developers would argue that its not a part of DOM standard.
    8. One may look at disable-output-escaping as at a feature only allowing some tricks but there are more issues.
    9. Is that really such high price for meeting expectation of your users?

    You may object that you still build the only valid DOM tree, but it true only until you suppose serialization of the output to be a plain projection of the DOM template. Comment 110 Dmitri Snytkine 2009-06-01 08:27:11 PDT Guys, this thread has been going on for almost 8 years! asked 6 years ago viewed 1044 times active 6 years ago Upcoming Events 2016 Community Moderator Election ends in 9 days Related 3Why is the XSLT disable-output-escaping not implemented in Firefox?3Transforming

    Comment 54 jonpughuk 2004-09-30 03:35:01 PDT Created attachment 160625 [details] Challenge.html - a file which explains what the testcase files are about This attachement contains the html posted to the mozillazine Workaround? Comment 114 Jonas Sicking (:sicking) No longer reading bugmail consistently 2009-06-02 10:04:33 PDT Yes, serializing and reparsing is what we'd like to do. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3044084/xslt-disable-output-escaping-when-disable-output-escaping-is-not-supported Comment 122 Scott Trenda 2010-03-22 16:49:09 PDT Created attachment 434081 [details] A workaround template written in XSLT (updated) Previous workaround template, updated with named-entity support.

    Is not that I want to embed HTML in the XML (if I got it well, that is what is considered bad-formed XML). But in any case, it would be good to have a known workaround. Do you know how many hours I spent to get to this place? Not the answer you're looking for?

    Disable-output-escaping Yes Is Not Working In Xslt

    None of the earlier proposed solutions seem to work. https://bytes.com/topic/net/answers/684344-firefox-doesnt-like-disable-output-escaping-setting-looking-alternatives All rights reserved. Disable-output-escaping= Yes Not Working And who are »they«? Xslt Disable-output-escaping Example For issues strictly specific to the book XSLT 1.1 Programmers Reference, please post to that forum instead.

    Polyglot Anagrams Cops' Thread Why did they look stupid? http://sevevb.com/not-working/disable-output-escaping-yes-is-not-working-in-xslt.html In the DOM tree, Firefox has this string "BBC Arabic News" as the value of this str element. So probably it would not be well-formed xhtml, and even not an html at all. A sysadmin has implemented a policy to change our login passwords once a month and required passwords to be 12 chars long. Xsl Text

    Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 418,812 IT Pros & Developers. For more details see Persona Deprecated. Thank you very much! this contact form more hot questions question feed lang-xml about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation

    I think this is a good way to contribute to development. Software is hard Inspecting WebSocket Traffic with Firefox Developer Tools - WebSocket monitor is an extension to Firefox developer tools that can be used to monitor WebSocket connections in Firefox. See bug 176668 Comment 29 Axel Hecht 2003-09-15 15:01:57 PDT *** Bug 219309 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Comment 30 Peter Van der Beken [:peterv] 2003-09-25

    My webapges consists of three parts: - opening of layout (title bar, left panel, few opened s) - content (area for most information) - closing of layout (right panel, footer, few

    It amazes me that this problem has not been resolved since 2001. We've always been open to fixing this, someone just needs to step up and provide an acceptable patch (don't slow down non-doe transforms). So we could go three ways with this: 1. Doing something useful with evil file formats like RSS which actually contain escaped content that you don't want escaped in the result tree.

    Patches are accepted, but it seems that no-one plans to spend time on fixing the issue. If that is what you want (XML document->parse->transform->serialize->XML document), I suggest you find a way that works with trees or use a server-side processor. Which XML encoding should I use? navigate here Fixing this shouldn't be very difficult.

    Now, I have to use server-side XSL Transformation which is very ugly I think. The value of Qs & As is greater when they're tagged correctly. The reference implementation, which is still Internet Explorer (flamebait), supports the XSLT spec properly - why doesn't Firefox/Mozilla? Firefox error?

    I find it is really a shame that it all works in IE 6.0 as in W3C specifications and just as I expect to. :-) and fast i guess i'll just that left angle brackets and ampersands may occur in their literal form; they need not (and cannot) be escaped using "<" and "&".